Why include church history in a study of biblical doctrines? Hopefully, this question has surfaced in the minds of some as we've discussed doctrines over the last five weeks. This seems like a fair question, so I wanted to take a post briefly to address it? If we're seeking to consider what the Bible has to say about God and doctrine, what are we doing studying a creed? First, it should be stated that depending on your background or upbringing, you may already be disposed one way or the other regarding the value of considering church history, and most of what has come from it. Having been raised as a Baptist, for example, I was always naturally inclined to think that anything that seemed remotely high church, formal, or "Roman Catholic" in any way should be viewed with a little suspicion from the outset. This included learning or reciting any kind of creed or confessional statement. Maybe you can relate.
We will always test what others (both past and present) have written by comparing it to Scripture. Some of it will be wrong and should be discarded. But there is much that will also prove to be helpful as we struggle to get our arms around the doctrines of the Bible that we are studying. Just some food for thought...
1 comment:
Thanks for the post. I so agree. The church is much bigger than 20th century Christianity. Our story is much broader than the American church. Ours is a catholic faith that stretches from the contemporary worshipers of the Son to His first followers in Jerusalem and everyone in between. I pray that I am never so arrogant and full of hubris as to think I can not learn from my ancient brothers. They too had the Spirit. They too are apart of the body. They too are apart of the dialogue and the story of Christ's body.
Post a Comment